CorporazioneAttiva
[DI LI] Discourse Of Lightbringers
5 membriTasse 10%Fondata nel 2019
CEORageDemonIndipendente- Kill
- 4
- +0 negli ultimi 90 giorni
- Perdite
- 22
- +0 negli ultimi 90 giorni
- Efficienza
- Efficienza ISK 5%
- ISK distrutti
- 439.6M
- +0 negli ultimi 90 giorni
- Attività
- Inattivo
- 0 kill/giorno · ultimi 90 giorni
Scheda di combattimento
Numeri da eve-kill, di tutta la carriera
Combattimento
- Kill
- 4
- Perdite
- 22
- Indice di pericolo
- 100%
- Colpi finali
- 2
- Punti
- 4
ISK
- Distrutti
- 439.6M
- Persi
- 8.88B
- Bilancio
- -8.44B
- Efficienza ISK
- 5%
Solo
- Kill in solo
- 2
- Percentuale solo
- 50%
- Kill medie/giorno
- —
Altro
- Perdite contro NPC
- 0
- Quota perdite NPC
- 0%
- Attività
- Inattivo
Attività
Cosa vola la corporazione, dove combatte, le ultime kill e perdite
I più preziosi
Le kill più costose del periodo
Chi incontra
Chi uccide, da chi viene uccisa e cosa perde
Ultimi 90g
Uccisi
Ucciso da
Scafi persiPerdite suddivise per classe di scafo.
Battaglie
Gli scontri nella finestra scelta, dal nostro archivio killmail
Descrizione
The 10 Commandments of Logic
1) Thou shall not attack the person's character, but the argument. (Ad hominem)
2) Thou shall not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make them easier to attack. (Straw man fallacy)
3) Thou shall not use small numbers to represent the whole. (Hasty generalization)
4) Thou shall not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. (Begging the question)
5) Thou shall not claim that because something occured before, it must be the cause. (Post Hoc/False cause)
6) Thou shall not reduce the argument down to two possibilties. (False dichotomy)
7) Thou shall not argue that because of our ignorance, claim must be true or false. (Ad ignorantum)
8) Thou shall not lay the burden of proof onto him that is questioning the claim. (Burden of proof reversal)
9) Thou shall not assume "this" follows "that" when it has no logical connection. (Non sequitur)
10) Thou shall not claim that because a premise is popular, therefore it must be true. (Bandwagon fallacy)
If you understand the previouse defenitions you are a member of this religeon.
How well you identify when people break a Commandment, is how good you are at practicing this religion, and protecting your self from nonsence and bullshit of all types.
All Fleet Doctrine Based Around The Friend Ship
1) Thou shall not attack the person's character, but the argument. (Ad hominem)
2) Thou shall not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make them easier to attack. (Straw man fallacy)
3) Thou shall not use small numbers to represent the whole. (Hasty generalization)
4) Thou shall not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. (Begging the question)
5) Thou shall not claim that because something occured before, it must be the cause. (Post Hoc/False cause)
6) Thou shall not reduce the argument down to two possibilties. (False dichotomy)
7) Thou shall not argue that because of our ignorance, claim must be true or false. (Ad ignorantum)
8) Thou shall not lay the burden of proof onto him that is questioning the claim. (Burden of proof reversal)
9) Thou shall not assume "this" follows "that" when it has no logical connection. (Non sequitur)
10) Thou shall not claim that because a premise is popular, therefore it must be true. (Bandwagon fallacy)
If you understand the previouse defenitions you are a member of this religeon.
How well you identify when people break a Commandment, is how good you are at practicing this religion, and protecting your self from nonsence and bullshit of all types.
All Fleet Doctrine Based Around The Friend Ship