CorporationCorporation Closed
[M1N3R] Motsu Mining Corp
0 membersFounded in 2010
- Kills
- 4
- Losses
- 11
- Efficiency
- ISK Efficiency 34%
- ISK destroyed
- 118.8M
- Activity
- Unknown
Combat Record
Career-long numbers from eve-kill
Combat
- Kills
- 4
- Losses
- 11
- Danger Ratio
- 100%
- Final Blows
- 4
- Points
- 4
ISK
- Destroyed
- 118.8M
- Lost
- 226.8M
- Balance
- -108.0M
- ISK Efficiency
- 34%
Solo
- Solo Kills
- 4
- Solo Ratio
- 100%
- Avg Kills/Day
- —
Other
- NPC Losses
- 0
- NPC Loss Ratio
- 0%
- Activity
- Unknown
Battles
Engagements in the selected window, from our own killmail archive
Description
[quote=Archestratidas]Oh, another question.. came to me right after I hit post.
Will faction ships be given higher point values than their standard class (dramiels = frigates, cynabals = cruisers)? One of the reasons they're popular among BC pilots is their ability to whore significant amounts of BC points while risking very few points themselves. They're demonstrably superior to t1 ships and giving a cynabal the same point value as, say, a rupture wouldn't make for a particularly well balanced system imo.
[/quote]
You make a good point. The scoring algorithm was developed some time before CCP made faction ships worth flying, however, and so they currently reward the same amount of points as their tech 1 counterparts. You're right that they are now far superior to those, though; I'll keep it in mind.[/quote]
Will faction ships be given higher point values than their standard class (dramiels = frigates, cynabals = cruisers)? One of the reasons they're popular among BC pilots is their ability to whore significant amounts of BC points while risking very few points themselves. They're demonstrably superior to t1 ships and giving a cynabal the same point value as, say, a rupture wouldn't make for a particularly well balanced system imo.
[/quote]
You make a good point. The scoring algorithm was developed some time before CCP made faction ships worth flying, however, and so they currently reward the same amount of points as their tech 1 counterparts. You're right that they are now far superior to those, though; I'll keep it in mind.[/quote]